Agencies | Online Services | Policies

                                          

The Arkansas Lawyer
Winter 2002

BOOK REVIEW


Blood in Their Eyes
by Grif Stockley
Reviewed by: John P. Gill

     I miss Gideon Page, the hero of Grif Stockley's previous novels. Gideon Page is my kind of lawyer ­ standing alone against the odds, against the establishment and winning for the little guy. That is what mainstream Arkansas lawyers do today. So Blood in Their Eyes is required reading for every Arkansas lawyer, because this time Grif Stockley reviews the work of a real Gideon Page, a black lawyer named Scipio Jones who read law to become licensed and became one of Arkansas' outstanding lawyers. Jones is credited with one of the most important cases in American history, Moore v. Dempsey 261 U.S. 86(1923), and standing alone many times, saved the lives of 12 innocent, albeit convicted, black sharecroppers from Elaine, Arkansas.
     The Elaine race riot, as history until now has called it, is an awful blemish on Arkansas history. It is such a blemish that most historians have treated it lightly or shied away from it. But Grif Stockley, an outstanding Arkansas lawyer in his own right, is not known for shying away from much of anything, and he tackles the issue head on in his first writing on Arkansas history. In typical lawyer fashion Stockley analyzes the facts and writes his brief in Blood in Their Eyes. The death toll of white citizens is easily verified from the court and newspaper records. Five men were killed. According to the trial transcripts, affidavits, and research by Stockley, some of the white men were apparently killed by other white men in their frenzy to shoot black citizens of Phillips County. The black death toll has never been verified, and even Stockley's laborious analysis of the facts fails to document the number. It is somewhere between 20 and 856; the total will likely never be known. But Stockley, exhibiting his experience as a lawyer, analyzes the facts and identifies the events as a massacre, not a riot, because even 20 deaths fit that description in the events Stockley brings to light, namely, shooting unarmed blacks with their hands in the air, and burying many in unmarked graves. Without saying so, Stockley's description of the events matches those recently reported in Bosnia and Kosovo.
     Blood in Their Eyes reports the events which started on the night of September 30, 1919 at the Hopp Spur Church in Phillips County, near Elaine, Arkansas, where a group of black sharecroppers had gathered for a meeting of the Progressive Farmers and Household Union. Farming conditions in the Arkansas Delta in 1919 are not what they are today, and the sharecroppers, with grievances over cotton prices paid by their white landlords, attended the meeting. Why armed guards were posted outside the church is unclear. An automobile carrying a Deputy Sheriff, a Railroad Detective for the Missouri Pacific, and a Trustee from the Phillips County Jail stopped in front of the church about 11:00 p.m. and the shooting started. Who shot first and why is unclear, but Stockley gives a trial lawyers' analysis of the questions and answers. When the shooting stopped, a white peace officer was dead. By morning hundreds, perhaps thousands, of armed men from both sides of the Mississippi River converged on Elaine, and a group of armed blacks exchanged gunfire. The following day battle-hardened veterans from the battle of the Marne stationed at Camp Pike arrived, with Governor Charles Borough in the lead.
     Blood in Their Eyes sorts out many of the historical reports of this event, and Stockley disagrees with many of them unsupported by the evidence. But, his astonishing conclusion that the Camp Pike veterans themselves participated in the slaughter of innocent American Citizens is a new chapter in this tragic event.
     Twelve sharecroppers were tried for murder of five whites (no whites were arrested) and Stockley laboriously reviewed trial transcripts, Supreme Court briefs, correspondence, and court opinions to find historical facts and support his writing. His legal analysis is a new and very much needed addition to the reports of other historians. In several instances he demonstrates the power of circumstantial evidence, and throughout his book, Stockley demonstrates his outstanding skills as a lawyer in this analysis of the records. Perhaps if historians had started where Stockley excels, much of the written history of this event would be different. No lawyer, nor anyone else who loves freedom in a democratic society, can read these events without getting sick to their stomach. American Citizens were tried for murder in an Arkansas courtroom less than 30 days after their arrest, defended predominately by attorneys who called no witnesses, failed to strike any juror for bias, and in general make no closing arguments. The jury was out for eight minutes on the first trial. As many as three separate trials are held by the same judge in a single day and all defendant's were found guilty and sentenced to death. One of the Defendant's attorneys later urged the Governor to carry out the death sentences.
     A must read portion of the book is Stockley's cross examination-like juxtaposition of Prosecutor John Miller's statements in 1919 and his later statements as a retired U.S. District Judge.
     The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed all of the convictions, and the fictional Gideon Page never had the challenges that the real life Scipio Jones experienced. Jones was not hired until late November, after all 12 have been convicted. He was retained by black Little Rock citizens to work with a white attorney George W. Murphy, employed by the NAACP, and later as co counsel with Edgar L. McHaney, another white attorney. Although he was prohibited from arguing the case, it was through Jones' efforts, that Moore v. Dempsey, for the first time, permitted collateral attack, thru habeus corpus, on a state appellate court decision. All 12 Defendants were finally freed five years after their conviction, through a maze of motions, appeals, retrials, and executive clemency that only a skilled lawyer could manage.
     The author frequently exhibits skill as an historical novelist; as an example he inserts that the Governor's wife "could have easily persuaded" the Governor to see Birth of a Nation, which played in Little Rock at the time. Perhaps an historical novel will be the next expression of his extraordinary talent. In the meantime, Stockley's in depth research and compelling arguments make Blood in Their Eyes worthwhile reading for every lawyer who aspires to try lawsuits.

return to previous page
    

Vol.37 No.1/Winter 2002                                  The Arkansas Lawyer                                       34