|
The
85th Arkansas General Assembly convened on January
10, 2005. It recessed on April 15 to reconvene on
May 13 for the purpose of considering vetoes, correcting
errors and oversights, completing its work on proposed
constitutional amendments and considering the need
for further extension of session. When it reconvened
on May 13, it adjourned sine die. Therefore, any Act
without an emergency clause or a provision specifying
its effective date became effective on August 12,
2005. There were 3176 Bills introduced of which 2325
became law. It is the purpose of this article to review
some of the major legislative issues of interest to
attorneys dealt with during this session.
All legislation proposed by the Arkansas Bar Association
in its legislative package was enacted into law. The
core of the package consisted of 3 billsThe
Arkansas Trust Code, Amendments to the Uniform Commercial
Code and an Act addressing retention of records by
state agencies.
ARKANSAS TRUST CODE - ACT 1031 of 2005
The Arkansas Trust Code
is the culmination of years of study by the National
Conference on Uniform State Laws which was tailored
to Arkansas by an Arkansas Bar Association task force
during a two-year study. It codifies a comprehensive
set of rules pertaining to trusts. Until enactment
of the Code, Arkansas law applicable to trusts was
largely found in cases or did not exist at all. Most
of the rules in the Code are "default rules"
which apply only when the trust document does not
have contrary provisions. Adoption of the Arkansas
Trust Code eliminates a great deal of uncertainty
and expense in connection with trusts in Arkansas.
It codifies Arkansas case law. It is largely consistent
with trust law in other states.
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AMENDMENTS -ACT 856 of
2005
Act 856 amends Articles
1, 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code. These amendments
are slight modifications of amendments adopted by
the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform
State Laws.
They basically modernize
the Commercial Code to deal with electronic transactions,
remotely created items and other aspects of banking
transactions.
RECORD RETENTION - ACT 918 of 2005
As a result of an Act
passed by the Legislature in 2001, there has been
no general requirement for agencies of the state to
preserve public records. Act 918 cures this deficiency
by requiring development of rules and guidelines for
the retention of public records commonly found in
most state agencies. It requires each state agency
to comply with the developed rules and guidelines
at a definite future time.
In addition to the legislative
package, there were a number of bills the Association
supported through the Legislation Committee. They
include:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACT AMENDMENTS - ACT 1158 of 2005
The current Limited
Partnership Act cross-references and incorporates
some substantive provisions of the old Arkansas Partnership
Act of 1991. When Arkansas adopted a new partnership
act in 1999, some of those cross-referenced substantive
provisions of the old Partnership Act of 1991 were
repealed effective January 1, 2005. This caused two
problems. First, since the repeal took effect on January
1, 2005, between the repeal date and the date of this
new legislation, certain kinds of limited partnerships
had been operating without the benefit of those repealed
provisions. Second, unless something was done, there
would continue to be no law in existence to fill the
void created by the repeal of the crossreferenced
substantive provisions.
Act 1158 cured both
problems. First, it revived part of the repealed language
from the old Partnership Act of 1991 on a retroactive
basis to cover the "gap" between the January
1, 2005 repeal and the effective date of the ActMarch
22, 2005. Second, the Act adopts provisions of the
new Partnership Act that was adopted in 1999, to be
applied after the effective date of the Act.
Consideration was given
to adopting an entirely new Limited Partnership Act
in order to modernize Arkansas Law. The Bill that
was introduced has been referred to the Business Law
Section of the Arkansas Bar Association for study
in order that it can be considered in the 2007 regular
session.
CRIMINAL CODE REVISION - ACT 1994 of 2005
The framework for the
Arkansas Criminal Code was adopted in 1975. Over the
ensuing years much legislation establishing new crimes
and penalties did not fit the framework. In the 2003
regular session, the Arkansas Bar Association supported
legislation which authorized the establishment of
the Arkansas Criminal Code Revision Commission. Act
1994 of 2005 is the culmination of almost two years
of work by that diversified Commission which studied
all criminal provisions of the Code and recommended
modifications to reestablish consistency.
SMALL ESTATES AMENDMENT - ACT 899 of 2005
The sole change to current
law addressed by Act 899 increases the maximum amount
of the value of an estate for treatment as a small
estate from $50,000 to $100,000.
SIMULTANEOUS DEATH - ACT 74 of 2005
The new Uniform Simultaneous
Death Act (2005) was adopted by Act 74 of 2005 to
become effective January 1, 2006. Generally, under
this new Act, an individual who is not established
by clear and convincing evidence to have survived
another individual by at least one hundred twenty
(120) hours is deemed to have predeceased the other
individual. Likewise, if a provision of a governing
instrument relates to an individual surviving the
event, including the death of another individual,
an individual who is not established by clear and
convincing evidence to have survived the event by
one hundred twenty (120) hours is deemed to have predeceased
the event.
Some other new laws
include:
BENEFICIARY DEEDS - ACT 1918 of 2005
A new form of conveyance
of title in real property, to be known as a Beneficiary
Deed, is created by Act 1918. A Beneficiary Deed conveys
an interest in real property to a designated grantee
beneficiary effective upon the death of the grantee
(owner) subject to any debt secured by a lien on the
real property and other interests specifically set
forth in the legislation. A Beneficiary Deed is not
effective until the death of the grantor, and then
only if it has been previously recorded and no revocation
by the grantor has been recorded. Some forms are set
forth in the legislation.
PATIENT
MEDICAL RECORDS PRACTICE ACT - ACT 1436 of 2005
Any party in private
litigation in a civil action who receives or obtains
a copy of a patient's medical records from a doctor,
hospital, or other custodian of records by using a
subpoena, court order, or consent form signed by the
patient must provide written notice of receipt of
the records to the patient or the patient's attorney
if the patient is represented by an attorney. The
notice must include the name and address of the provider
for each record which was obtained and it must be
made by either mail with a return receipt requested
and delivery restricted to the addressee or the agent
of the addressee or by facsimile with a receipt or
transaction report showing that the transmittal was
received. If the required notice is not given, a party
in litigation is prohibited from introducing the patient's
medical records into evidence or referring to those
records in any manner in a legal proceeding relating
to the patient. This legislation provides that it
shall be deemed to be superseded upon adoption of
a Supreme Court rule which is substantially similar.
INTENT TO SETTLE CONTESTED CLAIMS - ACT 2271 of 2005
If an insured notifies
an insurer in writing that the amount of, or liability
for, a claim is contested and requests in writing
notice of the insurer's settlement of the claim, then
the insurer is required to provide its insured written
notice of the terms of settlement of the claim. These
provisions do not apply to personal line of insurance.
It is recommended that
practitioners review the Summary of Action handed
out at the Arkansas Bar Association's Annual Meeting.
A copy of the Summary can be obtained from the Association.
|